Retail once considered a sleepy corner of the market has morphed into a dynamic sector where technology‑enabled commerce and traditional consumption coexist. In 2026, retail ETFs remain compelling for investors who want exposure to broader economic trends like consumer spending, digital transformation, and cyclical recovery without betting on individual stocks.
ETFs let investors diversify across dozens of companies tied to retail performance, from discount chains to e‑commerce platforms. Below are seven retail‑focused ETFs worth watching, with insights you can use to evaluate fit for your portfolio.
- State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT)
Investment Thesis: XRT is one of the purest ways to track the U.S. retail landscape. Rather than focusing only on the largest retailers, it uses an equal‑weight methodology, which gives smaller and mid‑size retail players a louder voice than traditional market‑cap weighted funds. That broad exposure can make XRT more responsive to shifts in consumer behavior across sub‑segments.
Expense Ratio: 0.35%
Top Holdings: Dollar General, Bath & Body Works, Target, eBay, Burlington Stores (each 1.5–1.8% weight)
Net Assets: $500M range (mid‑size ETF)
Why It Matters: With exposure to apparel, specialty, food, automotive and broadline retail, XRT gives a diversified cross‑section of the sector, from discount retail to specialty stores. Retail’s performance has been mixed, but stable consumer spending and resilient jobs data are supporting continued retail engagement in 2026.
Risk/Reward: As an equal‑weight fund, XRT has more volatility than market‑cap funds but can capture upside from smaller companies that outperform.
- VanEck Retail ETF (RTH)
Investment Thesis: RTH takes a more concentrated approach than XRT by tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, which tends to have a heavier tilt toward larger, established retail names. This means broader brands that dominate both physical and omnichannel sales are represented more heavily.
Expense Ratio: 0.35%
Top Holdings: Large retailers such as Walmart, Home Depot, and historically heavy weights like Amazon (in other versions of the underlying retail index).
Net Assets: Moderate (multiple hundreds of millions)
Note: For investors who want broad but quality‑tilted retail exposure without overwhelming focus on niche names, RTH balances blue‑chip retail with select diversification. The strategy can help during economic expansions when large players often benefit from scale.
Risk/Reward: Less concentrated in small caps than XRT, but more sensitive to consumer spending trends given weighting in broadline and big‑box retailers.
- Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY)
Investment Thesis: IBUY targets the digital side of retail, seeking exposure to companies that generate significant revenue online or from digital marketplaces. In a world where consumer behavior shifts rapidly between online and physical shopping, this ETF captures growth trends in e‑commerce and omnichannel retail.
Expense Ratio: 0.65%
Top Holdings: A mix of large‑cap and mid/small‑cap retail stocks with meaningful online revenues (varied beyond just mega names).
Net Assets: Smaller relative to broader retail ETFs
Why It Matters: Digital retail remains a structural trend with a long runway as consumer preferences evolve. IBUY’s broader e‑commerce net including marketplaces, omnichannel players, and niche digital retailers, offers a thematic play on that trend.
Risk/Reward: Higher expense ratio and smaller asset base can mean more volatility; but for long‑term growth focused on online consumer behavior, IBUY has strategic appeal.
- First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF (FTXD)
Investment Thesis: FTXD combines smart‑beta elements with retail exposure, blending growth, value, and volatility factors within retail stocks. This means the ETF doesn’t strictly follow a traditional market index, but instead aims to overweight companies that demonstrate favorable trading and fundamental behavior in the Nasdaq retail space.
Expense Ratio: 0.60%
Top Holdings: Includes a range of large retail names like TJX Companies and Kohl’s, often with factor‑based tilts.
Net Assets: Smaller to mid range
Why It Matters: Smart‑beta ETFs like FTXD appeal to investors seeking enhanced factor exposure rather than strict index tracking. It’s a blend of quality, momentum, and diversified retail forces.
Risk/Reward: Factor approaches can outperform passive portfolios in certain environments, but add costs and may lag in simple rallies.
- Amplify eCommerce Retail ETF (EBIZ)
Investment Thesis: Similar to IBUY, EBIZ is a thematic ETF focused primarily on e‑commerce, but with a distinct portfolio concentration that also includes travel and marketplace platforms tied to digital retail revenue.
Expense Ratio: ~0.50%
Top Holdings: A blend of global online and digital commerce names (varies over time).
Net Assets: Relatively modest
Nite: EBIZ’s diverse digital retail mix combined with some mid‑cap emphasis offers a slightly different composition than pure online marketplace ETFs, with broader thematic reach.
Risk/Reward: Smaller assets and thematic tilt mean higher potential reward and volatility.
- SPDR S&P Retail Select Industry ETF Lite (Hypothetical/Variant)
Investment Thesis: Though the SPDR family includes the core XRT product, variants with a “Lite” or modified index focus may emerge as retail sector dynamics evolve. These ETFs aim to track subsets of retail or consumer discretionary behavior with cost‑efficient structures. ETFs that track specific subindices within retail can help investors fine‑tune exposure to niche but growing segments.
Expense Ratio: Typically comparable to standard retail ETFs (0.30–0.50%)
Top Holdings & Net Assets: Depends on the index tracked
Nite: Retail is not monolithic some funds exist that parse out home improvement, specialty retail, or omnichannel performance for targeted exposure.
Risk/Reward: Less diversified than broader funds but sharper alignment with specific retail trends.
- VanEck Retail ETF with Possible Emerging Variants
Investment Thesis: Beyond RTH there are VanEck variants that incorporate semi‑annual rebalancing or global retail considerations. These can broaden exposure beyond pure U.S. retail with international consumer play, though pure U.S. versions remain more liquid and common.
Expense Ratio: Typically 0.35%
Top Holdings: Regional diversification elements where applicable
Net Assets: Mid hundreds of millions
Note: For investors seeking global retail cyclical exposure or rebalanced thematic strategies, ETF families from established issuers like VanEck provide useful alternatives.
Risk/Reward: Broader geo diversification can temper U.S. retail downturns but add currency and regional risk.
How to Think About Retail ETFs in 2026
Retail isn’t one monolithic story. The sector is grappling with:
Digital vs Traditional Consumption: E‑commerce growth continues, but physical retail still plays a major role in consumer spending patterns.
Inflation & Consumer Confidence: Spending power especially for discretionary retail is tied to wage growth, inflation, and macro sentiment.
Cyclical Sensitivity: Retail tends to be cyclical, meaning performance can swing with economic expansions and contractions.
ETFs give exposure without the need to select individual winners and diversified funds can act as barometers of broader consumer trends. Choosing between broad exposure (like XRT), digital emphasis (IBUY/EBIZ), or smart‑beta approaches (FTXD) depends on how you view consumer trends in the year ahead.
Takeaway
Retail ETFs provide a versatile way to capture the health of consumer spending and sector transformations in one place without the idiosyncratic risk of single stock selection. Whether your focus is on traditional retail recovery, e‑commerce acceleration, factor tilts, or broader consumption trends, the seven ETFs above represent meaningful ways to be positioned in 2026.
We believe the information in this material is reliable, but we cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. The opinions, estimates, and strategies shared reflect the author’s judgment based on current market conditions and may change without notice.
The views and strategies shared in this material represent the author’s personal judgment and may differ from those of other contributors at IntriguePages. This content does not constitute official IntriguePages research and should not be interpreted as such. Before making any financial decisions, carefully consider your personal goals and circumstances. For personalized guidance, please consult a qualified financial advisor.
